首页> 外文OA文献 >Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis
【2h】

Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis

机译:子宫下段厚度超声测量预测剖宫产妇女分娩时子宫破裂:荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of antenatal sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness in the prediction of risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor (TOL) in women with a previous Cesarean section (CS). METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify articles published on the subject of sonographic LUS measurement and occurrence of a uterine defect after delivery. Four independent researchers performed identification of papers and data extraction. Selected studies were scored on methodological quality, and sensitivity and specificity of measurement of LUS thickness in the prediction of a uterine defect were calculated. We performed bivariate meta-analysis to estimate summary receiver-operating characteristics (sROC) curves. RESULTS: We included 21 studies with a total of 2776 analyzed patients. The quality of included studies was good, although comparison was difficult because of heterogeneity. The estimated sROC curves showed that measurement of LUS thickness seems promising in the prediction of occurrence of uterine defects (dehiscence and rupture) in the uterine wall. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of myometrial LUS thickness for cut-offs between 0.6 and 2.0 mm was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60-0.87) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97); cut-offs between 2.1 and 4.0 mm reached a sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.81-0.98) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.26-0.90). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of full LUS thickness for cut-offs between 2.0 and 3.0 mm was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.42-0.77) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96); cut-offs between 3.1 and 5.1 mm reached a sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.30-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides support for the use of antenatal LUS measurements in the prediction of a uterine defect during TOL. Clinical applicability should be assessed in prospective observational studies using a standardized method of measurement.
机译:目的:评估产前超声检查剖宫产(CS)妇女在分娩试验(TOL)期间子宫破裂风险的预测中,对子宫下段(LUS)厚度进行产前超声检查的准确性。方法:对PubMed和EMBASE进行搜索,以鉴定关于超声LUS测量和分娩后子宫缺损发生情况的文章。四名独立研究人员进行了论文鉴定和数据提取。对所选研究的方法学质量进行评分,并计算LUS厚度测量在预测子宫缺损中的敏感性和特异性。我们进行了双变量荟萃分析,以估算汇总的接收者操作特征(sROC)曲线。结果:我们纳入了21项研究,共分析了2776名患者。纳入研究的质量很好,尽管由于异质性很难进行比较。估计的sROC曲线表明,LUS厚度的测量在预测子宫壁子宫缺陷(裂开和破裂)的发生方面似乎很有希望。肌层LUS厚度在0.6到2.0 mm之间的临界值的综合敏感性和特异性分别为0.76(95%CI,0.60-0.87)和0.92(95%CI,0.82-0.97);在2.1至4.0 mm之间的临界值达到了0.94(95%CI,0.81-0.98)和0.64(95%CI,0.26-0.90)的灵敏度和特异性。 LUS厚度在2.0至3.0 mm之间的临界值的综合灵敏度和特异性分别为0.61(95%CI,0.42-0.77)和0.91(95%CI,0.80-0.96); 3.1和5.1 mm之间的临界值达到了0.96(95%CI,0.89-0.98)和0.63(95%CI,0.30-0.87)的敏感性和特异性。结论:这项荟萃分析为在产前检查期间子宫缺损的预测中使用产前LUS测量提供了支持。临床应用性应在前瞻性观察研究中使用标准化的测量方法进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号